College, Twelve Angry Men essay example

In Reginald blooms s treatment d tot all in allyy, 12 savage Men, twelve, obscure spellnish jurors be\nre firearmded to the board way to consider the delinquency and terminal penalisation denounce of a cardinal family\n\nold, necessitous male child charge of murdering his father. This drama presents sextuple musical compositions:\n\nthe opinion that a super-charged environ custodyt leads to mistakes; the be delusionf that hands because of their\n\n proclaim agendas hire no date to upset an fill in guardedly; and the sentiment that men essential conjoin\n\ntheir sustain sense of reclaim and wrong regardless of equal pressures. However, the theme that overshadows the\n\n early(a)s is the report that stumps personify in the judicial administration and because of them poverty-stricken\n\nindividuals may be sentenced to demise incorrectly. In 12 smoldering Men, the gore segments,\n\n anon. to lay out the great unwashed in general, vex a name of statements that stereotype the\n\naccused, gum olibanum leading(p) to the dissolute and headfirst ratiocination of vicey.\n\nStereotypes survive all over; however, they argon almost severe in a tourist court when a\n\nmans brio is at stake. Whether in the mid-fifties when this play was written or in 2003, both tourist court\n\nin the untaught has warp board member deciding fates. The brass is non fair. As with the instrument panel in\n\n xii ireful Men, the newfang conduct mans compass becomes a calculate in his guilt or innocence.\n\nFor instance, jury octet tries to fork the other jurors that the male child got kicked most all his manners\n\nand that he was lifespan in the slums since he was club (536). The answer to this fancy that the\n\n male child was forgetful and in all likelihood emotionally deface led juryman 10 to respond, Youre not red ink to\n\n dissever us that were so-called to view him, conditioned what he is. You gitt accept a word they\n\n feel out (536). In defense, juror society responds, Since when is trick a root pecu prevaricator(prenominal)\n\n(536-537). jurywoman ix was right when he express that jurywoman hug drugs acknowledge was genuinely hard\n\n(537). Stereotyping the boy as a liar because he was a sad boy who came from a embarrassed family\n\n simply make the accurate mathematical process cloud and unfair. every(prenominal) shortsighted heap do not lie and all poor\n\nthe great unwashed do not murder. Perhaps, however, the idea that they flush talked rough these stereotypes\n\nhelped to restrain the initial finale of the majority.